1966 Audi Variant vs. 1998 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (74 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Audi Variant weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Audi Variant (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (113 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1966 Audi Variant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 1998 Citroen Xsara | |
| Make | Audi | Citroen |
| Model | Variant | Xsara |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |
