1966 Audi Variant vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Audi Variant weights approximately 105 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | Variant | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2590 mm |