1966 Audi Variant vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 582 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln LS (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | Variant | LS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2990 mm |
