1966 Audi Variant vs. 2000 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 635 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Catera (270 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2000 Cadillac Catera | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Variant | Catera |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2961 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2740 mm |