1966 Audi Variant vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 1026 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | Variant | Viper |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 7990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 1154 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 98.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2450 mm |