1966 Audi Variant vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Audi Variant weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Variant | eK |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2350 mm |
