1966 Audi Variant vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 472 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (321 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Audi Variant 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Audi Ford
Model Variant Mustang
Year Released 1966 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1696 cc 4009 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 71 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 128 Nm 321 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 100.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 84.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1070 kg 1542 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2620 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]