1966 Audi Variant vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (187 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Audi Variant 2004 Mazda 3
Make Audi Mazda
Model Variant 3
Year Released 1966 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1696 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 71 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 128 Nm 187 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1070 kg 1235 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2680 mm