1966 Audi Variant vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Audi Variant weights approximately 126 kg more than 2004 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Variant | Camry |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2362 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 944 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2710 mm |
