1966 Audi Variant vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | Variant | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
