1966 Audi Variant vs. 2006 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2006 Nissan Frontier is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,501 cc, 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Nissan Frontier is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Frontier. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Frontier (235 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2006 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Variant | Frontier |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2501 cc |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3200 mm |