1966 Audi Variant vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant.
Because 2007 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Variant | XJ |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 90.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3170 mm |