1966 Audi Variant vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Micra (87 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Audi Variant weights approximately 30 kg more than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 128 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Variant | Micra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2440 mm |