1966 Audi Variant vs. 2009 BMW X3
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X3 (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant.
Because 2009 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X3 (580 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Audi Variant | 2009 BMW X3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | Variant | X3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 17.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2800 mm |