1966 Audi Variant vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Variant | HHR |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |
