1966 Audi Variant vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 224 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | Variant | 6 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1294 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2730 mm |
