1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe
To start off, 1966 Austin A 40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe would be higher. At 3,546 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe (85 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe weights approximately 635 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1952 Chevrolet DeLuxe | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | DeLuxe |
Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3546 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 95.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1397 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |