1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1955 Packard Patrician
To start off, 1966 Austin A 40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1955 Packard Patrician | |
Make | Austin | Packard |
Model | A 40 | Patrician |
Year Released | 1966 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3240 mm |