1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1957 DKW Universal
To start off, 1966 Austin A 40 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 DKW Universal would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 DKW Universal weights approximately 163 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1957 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1957 DKW Universal | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 40 | Universal |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2460 mm |
