1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1966 Austin A 40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 323 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2540 mm |