1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1966 Austin A 40 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 908 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3030 mm |
