1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Austin A 40 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 40 weights approximately 102 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Austin | Lotus |
| Model | A 40 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 45 L |
