1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1969 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1969 Jaguar E-Type is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar E-Type (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 638 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1969 Jaguar E-Type | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 40 | E-Type |
Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |