1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1976 Opel Kadett is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 47 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Opel Kadett weights approximately 58 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Austin A 40 (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Opel Kadett. (71 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1966 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1976 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | A 40 | Kadett |
Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 43 L |