1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1976 Toyota Mark II is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Toyota Mark II (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 433 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2590 mm |