1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,955 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser (153 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 1138 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1980 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2740 mm |