1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 8 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | A 40 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2160 mm |
