1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 168 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin A 40 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Austin Mitsubishi
Model A 40 Colt
Year Released 1966 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 47 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 81 Nm 112 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 762 kg 930 kg
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4120 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2390 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]