1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1992 Buick Century
To start off, 1992 Buick Century is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Buick Century (161 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Century (251 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1992 Buick Century | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Century |
Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 251 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2662 mm |