1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1994 Renault Argos
To start off, 1994 Renault Argos is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,239 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Argos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Renault Argos (90 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Renault Argos should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Renault Argos weights approximately 243 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Renault Argos (104 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1994 Renault Argos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1994 Renault Argos | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | Argos |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1239 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 115 L |
