1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1995 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1995 Ford Falcon is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,705 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Falcon weights approximately 818 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin A 40 1995 Ford Falcon
Make Austin Ford
Model A 40 Falcon
Year Released 1966 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 3705 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 47 HP 228 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 81 Nm 398 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 762 kg 1580 kg
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2800 mm