1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 40 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 447 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3530 mm |
