1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1074 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 40 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2730 mm |