1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 40 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2730 mm |
