1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 828 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1997 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A 40 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4960 mm |
