1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Daewoo Musson
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Musson is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,198 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Musson is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Musson (108 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Musson should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Musson weights approximately 334 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daewoo Musson is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Musson will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Musson (420 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Musson will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1999 Daewoo Musson | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A 40 | Musson |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1096 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 48 L |
