1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Dodge Prowler
To start off, 1999 Dodge Prowler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Prowler weights approximately 324 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Prowler (610 Nm) has 529 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 1999 Dodge Prowler | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 40 | Prowler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1086 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2750 mm |
