1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Eagle Vision
To start off, 1999 Eagle Vision is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Eagle Vision weights approximately 808 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 1999 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Austin | Eagle |
Model | A 40 | Vision |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |