1966 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1999 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Celica (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota Celica weights approximately 328 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin A 40 1999 Toyota Celica
Make Austin Toyota
Model A 40 Celica
Year Released 1966 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 1792 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 47 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 81 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.7 mm 91.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 762 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 29 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]