1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2001 Dodge Viper is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 403 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Viper weights approximately 1168 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 583 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2001 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 2001 Dodge Viper | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 40 | Viper |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 7990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 450 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 664 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1930 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |
