1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Renault Clio weights approximately 300 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Renault Clio (207 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2001 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |