1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Xedos 9
To start off, 2002 Xedos 9 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Xedos 9 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Xedos 9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Xedos 9 weights approximately 823 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Xedos 9 (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Xedos 9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2002 Xedos 9 | |
Make | Austin | Xedos |
Model | A 40 | 9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 212 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2760 mm |