1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mahindra Bolero (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 933 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mahindra Bolero (156 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin A 40 | 2003 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | A 40 | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1695 kg |
