1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 1028 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Austin | Isuzu |
Model | A 40 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 74 L |