1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Bugatti Chiron
To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 500 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 569 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2005 Bugatti Chiron | |
Make | Austin | Bugatti |
Model | A 40 | Chiron |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 6255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 18 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 650 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 75.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1160 mm |