1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1989 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 40 | Ram |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 330 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 509 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 2751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 132 L |