1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1621 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 132 L |