1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2006 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | BLS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1760 mm |