1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1307 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40.

Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (425 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Austin A 40. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Austin A 40 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Austin Jeep
Model A 40 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 1966 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1098 cc 4701 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 47 HP 0 HP
Torque 81 Nm 425 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.7 mm 86.7 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 762 kg 2069 kg
Vehicle Length 3690 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 29 L 78 L