1966 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2011 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin A 40 | 2011 Lincoln MKZ | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | A 40 | MKZ |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 66 L |